some possible grounds for Scopus rejection on journal submission for inclusion

[faizal]

Journals may be rejected from Scopus inclusion due to various reasons. Here are some possible grounds for rejection:

# Editorial Concerns

- Metric Issues: Problems with citation rates, self-citation, or total citation rates can raise concerns about a journal's credibility ¹.

- Publication Concerns: Issues with publishing policies, peer-review processes, or editorial independence may lead to exclusion.

# Quality Control

- Radar Detection: Scopus's algorithm detects unusual publication patterns, such as sudden increases in article submissions or publications ¹.

- Continuous Curation: Scopus's Content Selection and Advisory Board (CSAB) reviews journals for quality, relevance, and consistency.

# Ethical Considerations

- Predatory Journal Practices: Journals engaging in unethical practices, like excessive fees, fake editorial boards, or misleading information, risk exclusion ¹.

# Other Reasons

- Discontinuation: Journals may be discontinued due to changes in ownership, focus, or publishing strategies.

- Failure to Meet Criteria: Journals must meet Scopus's criteria, including publishing regular issues, having an ISSN, and maintaining transparency.

For specific information on why a particular journal was rejected, consult Scopus's official website or contact their support team.